It has been observed, however, that the motion for a bill of particulars may have strategic advantages over a § 2-615 motion, because the latter, even where successful, usually results in the plaintiff being given an opportunity to refile.
SAMPLE RESPONSE TO DEMAND FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS NEW YORK CODE
In Illinois, for instance, it is more common for defendants to file a motion to dismiss under the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure § 2-615, claiming the pleaded facts to be insufficient to support the causes of action alleged. states, like New York, Illinois, California (CCP 454), and Virginia, use the bill of particulars, and even there motions for a bill of particulars may be disfavored or disused. state law, the bill of particulars was abolished in nearly all court systems in the 1940s and 1950s due to the widespread recognition that much of the information requested could be obtained more efficiently through the discovery process. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide in rule 7(f) that "the court may direct the government to file a bill of particulars". In civil cases, a bill of particulars is a pleading, which "amplifies" the complaint, but can also act as a discovery device or tool. An insufficient response to a request for a bill of particulars may be grounds for dismissal of the claim, or other sanctions against the responding party. It is not entirely clear whether this can be done in practice in Britain on the Allocation questionnaire. It is rarely used in American small claims cases. In a civil action such as a tort or breach of contract case, either attorney or party can request it. This request may be part of an omnibus motion, motion in limine, or similar motion. However, prosecuting attorneys cannot request the same of the defense. In criminal law, defense attorneys may file a motion requesting a bill of particulars from prosecuting attorneys.
0 kommentar(er)
